Срочно! Составьте 12 вопросов по тексту! Не с переводчика, а то балов не дам! Заранее Спасибо)
A recent survey found that 80% of computer games played by youngsters have some violence in them. Should violent video games be banned to avoid any harmful influences on children?
There are some advantages to banning violent computer games. To start with, they promote violence and crime as entertainment, making them seem glamorous and acceptable. Consequently, children may think it is alright to be aggressive in real life. Also, game heroes are often invincible and children sometimes confuse fantasy and reality. As a result, they may not understand that real violence has real consequences.
On the other hand, there are some arguments against banning violent video games. Firstly, they are an outlet for children to let off steam. Fighting the bad guys in a game can release tension and may make children calmer and less aggressive in real life. Secondly, playing video games can build different skills. Shooting games, for example, help children develop co-ordination skills.
All in all, there are arguments both for and against the banning of violent video games. I strongly believe it should be up to individual parents to decide what games their children play and therefore they should not be banned.

1. How do you think we should forbid children to play video games?2. What are the advantages of video games?3. What are the disadvantages of video games?4. You play these games?5. Parents should decide what games to play?6. Help a video game to calm down?Текст очень маленький, просто больше не хватает фантазии...