Отдам 30 БАЛЛОВ за ПРАВИЛЬНЫЕ ответы на задания по английскому. Ребят, которые шарят в английском, помогите!)
I. Определите, верны (True) или неверны (False) следующие утверждения.
1. The opening of Male airport led to destroying the island's environment.
2. The period of mass tourism in the Seychelles didn't last long.
3. According to the text, all the tourists who visit the Seychelles at the moment are people for whom such holiday is not really suitable.
4. The Seychelles are not popular with tourists inclined for adventure and the wonders of the world.
II. Ответьте на следующие вопросы.
1. Why is tourism important for the Seychelles?
2. What is the economic policy towards tourists at present?
3. Who is a perfect tourist, according to a conservationist in the Ministry of Tourism?
4. What is the state of local trade and business at the time of mass tourism?
III. Исправьте предложения в соответствии с содержанием текста.
1. Seychelles hotels are not allowed to rise above the surrounding houses.
2. The Seychelles have been advertised as a «Holiday Paradise» all over the world.

Сам текст:

Nobody visited the Seychelles much until 1971 when Male airport was opened and the world could flood in. Now more than half the country's earnings comes from tourism, an industry which could, if not managed properly, destroy the environment.
The painful lessons of the older world are well studied. No Seychelles hotel is allowed to rise above the surrounding palm trees and none may get rid of waste into the sea. After a brief period of package holidays and mass tourism, the current policy is to attract the «quality visitor». Because the amount of visitors must be limited to protect the environment, the quality of the tourist matters a great deal. Lindsay Chong Seng, a conservationist in the Ministry of Tourism, considers the economics extremely important: you have to earn as much as you can from each tourist if numbers are to be kept down. «A perfect tourist is active, hires a car, flies to other islands, takes boat trips, eats out, goes diving, spends money. When you get mass tourists without a lot of spending money, all you find is that the shops do no business and the local bus service is overcrowded.»
Atterville Ceydras, the nature warden1 on one of the islands, says that tourists have got to accept nature. «If it rains, that's nature, that's good. If the wind blows seaweed up on the beaches, that's nature. They say they come to see nature, they've got to put up with it.»
Not all do so. The international travel business has, over the last twenty years, made the mistake of letting the Seychelles be sold in Europe as a "Holiday Paradise"
ourists are now going who should probably not go — like ladies in elegant shoes who will not follow muddy walkways.
Many others, more inclined for adventure and the wonders of the world, do not go. Probably some rich, green-minded Westerners avoid it because of a guilty feeling that tourism spoils such places.